Many of the applications we use today derive from the .NET Framework, one of the most popular software development frameworks. As a prolific ecosystem, developers use it widely with many programming languages baked into it.
Its open-source nature makes the system popular, especially for devs with an expanse of projects requiring multiple platforms to run. Although the .NET Framework is fantastic, it is not without its flaws. Here are the pros and cons of .NET Framework programming and suitable for your needs.
What Is The .NET Framework
Microsoft’s .NET framework and ecosystem make developing desktop and web applications easy. It provides the programming environment for all phases of software development, so it is a popular platform currently used for various applications.
C#, F#, and Visual Basic are the languages used to write .NET applications. Language-agnostic Common Intermediate Language (CIL) is used to compile the code. Code compiled into assemblies is stored in files with the .dll or .exe extensions.
.NET programming is frequently used to develop web-based applications. However, it can be used for desktop applications and on mobile platforms, as well. .NET programming is widely used because of its ease of use, its well-known ecosystem, and because it provides a wide range of programming options.
As an open-source framework, .NET is not free of flaws, including its high cost and vendor lock-in. However, most .NET developers agree that the pros outweigh the cons. Developers can reuse code and components, creating applications with reusable code.
The best .NET software for your business is the one that offers web-based services, desktop software, and cloud infrastructure support.
Pro: Low-Code Design
Object-oriented programming frameworks eliminate unnecessary codes and require fewer developer skills. Furthermore, .NET developers can re-use the code and many other elements, simplifying the deployment process. Creating relevant applications is a significant time and cost saver from a business perspective.
Modularity facilitates the definition of object behavior and interactions without managing the inner attributes of objects. In OOP, code is more manageable, easier to test, and more responsive to recurring issues. Furthermore, it generally results in developers having to do less coding.
Through Microsoft .NET, developers can reuse code and components, saving time and development costs. From simple C# Pattern Programs to complex business apps, .NET programming can make it much more manageable.
Despite open source technologies, .NET development isn’t cheap. Visual Studio IDE will be a significant expenditure for you. Microsoft also offers other collaboration and QA services to simplify your work.
There are many licensing fees associated with the .NET family, and the costs can add up quickly. Larger projects can be expensive too. A reputable .NET Dev company that provides services at a more affordable price is always the best way to go in such a situation.
Outsourcing companies have most of their costs covered, so they shouldn’t significantly impact your project budget. Because of this, it could be a costly development framework for small businesses.
Pro: Universal .NET Standard
This year, Microsoft added a new library called .NET Standard to the .NET ecosystem. .NET Framework, .NET Core, and Xamarin base class libraries are used to measure this. XML documents and graphics rendering are standard functions that can be performed with these libraries. .NET Standard libraries make developers’ lives easier.
The Universal .NET Standard enables developers to use any language to access .NET to develop business logic, internal APIs, and application integration.
.NET works on multiple platforms, so developers can work using the same code base and business logic regardless of device, operating system, or language. Developers can write code once, and code will work correctly on all platforms.
This is especially useful when interacting with databases and rendering graphics in such projects. Furthermore, XML documents can now be easily edited.
Con: Memory Leaks/RAM-Intensive Development
.NET can consume a lot of RAM, which can be a big problem for software with many modules. If the software is poorly managed, high memory usage and performance issues can result in increased memory usage.
A common criticism of .NET is memory leaks and other memory-related problems. For this problem, .NET has a garbage collector, but developers still need to take additional steps for proper resource management. As a result, developers are always required to keep an eye on their projects to prevent memory leaks.
Furthermore, when the application scales, the leaks become more frequent. It requires additional effort and time for developers to manage their resources properly.
Pro: Reliable Support and Community
.NET has a vast community of developers and a great support community. Microsoft provides various tools, documentation, and articles to help developers. .NET also has well-developed and high-quality libraries.
.NET has been creating a massive community since it was launched, but it wasn’t until Microsoft made it open-source that it took off. The development framework was already immensely influential because the company’s products and services are so widely used.
Developers can download the latest versions of .NET from Windows Update, Visual Studio, and the Microsoft Download Center. Its community is well-populated, so there are plenty of resources, such as code samples, API documentation, and articles. When developers get stuck, they can search forums, tutorials, and documentation and find a solution.
Con: Microsoft-Only Vendor Lock-In
The best programming frameworks are the ones that can work across different OS platforms. When you’re limited to a single vendor, those on competing platforms are likely to miss on its benefits.
Because of Microsoft’s ownership of the .NET bundle, developers are stuck within Microsoft’s ecosystem. Projects undertaken under the framework will inevitably be affected by any changes or limitations imposed by the company. Developers will therefore have less control over the project overall.
An excellent example of this is Microsoft’s platform development, moving forward with .NET Core. A long and challenging transition period is always expected because the number of .NET Core applications outnumber those using the old .NET Framework.
Most devs have no say when this comes out and where. Transition to .NET Core may not be as high on the priority list in corporate environments. Nevertheless, these systems require support, and devs will lose support if they don’t transition.
The Bottom Line
.NET is a robust programming framework that provides lots of benefits. The framework’s benefits, however, are mitigated by its negative aspects. Regardless, the .NET Framework is a solid pick with only a few hangups.
For developers, companies, and developers, .NET is a good option when building mission-critical applications. Consider these pros and cons to see if they fit your needs.